Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Nieto (martial artist)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rafael Nieto (martial artist)[edit]
- Rafael Nieto (martial artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Six trivial mentions in Google News. Claim to fame is creation of Zen-Do, a non-notable form of karate that appears to be taught solely by Nieto. (When searching, do not confuse with Zen Do Kai.) Unreferenced stub tagged since 9/2007 w/o improvement. THF (talk) 13:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:N, lacks sources, and borders on a vanity page. KaySL (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts#Notability_guidelines for martial artists. jmcw (talk) 17:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep can't judge the level of his championships or coaching on the basis of the limited info. there but that is a definite claim of notability; has garnered some attention [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. JJL (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- week delete - The sources need adding for the championships which would swing it but it needs a cleanup . The newspapers seem to be using him as a goto reference but none of them is about him. --Nate1481 11:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.