Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rae Threat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rae Threat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Little coverage of subject by reliable sources. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Almost all of the sources are self-published sites (gram ponante, rebecca gin, tiny nibbles) or just plain unreliable (fleshbot, mishka). The AVN mention is scant. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Article by Rebecca Gin was published in No Magazine (http://www.nomagazine.co.nz/) and Tiny Nibbles is the personal site of Violet Blue, a published author and sex educator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.230.80.158 (talk) 08:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still self-published. Read WP:SPS. Morbidthoughts (talk) 12:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Note that 69.230.80.158 deleted the AfD template from the article page which may have delayed the discussion.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A shame, I like Rae Threat's work, but, sadly she doesn't meet our notability guidelines at this point, and per Morbidthoughts about AVN, etc. SarahStierch (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ^Message 16:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Profile article in NO Magazine was published and in circulation with a distribution of roughly 15,000 in print. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.220.77.140 (talk) 07:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.