Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Moscow (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Radio Moscow (band)[edit]
- Radio Moscow (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, refs do not establish notability. May or may not meet point 5 of WP:BAND, depending on your opinion of their label, however that's still not a guarantee of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 16:47, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A search for coverage found (in addition to the bio and reviews at Allmusic already in the article): OnMilwaukee.com, Des Moines Register, Daily Iowan, AV Club, Boston Phoenix staff blog, Portland Mercury staff blog, The Stranger, Little Village, City Weekly. Not all substantial coverage, but there's plenty there to pass WP:GNG and WP:BAND criterion 1. --Michig (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. In accordance with point 5 of WP:BAND, this band has released 4 albums on Alive Naturalsound Records, a notable independent music label that has released albums by other artists such as The Black Keys. Alive Naturalsound Records — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.53.247.196 (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. On the whole, there appears to be enough coverage (the Allmusic sources from the article plus the above links) to meet criterion 1 of WP:BAND. Gongshow Talk 07:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Michig. Pases WP:GNG. Lord Roem (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.