Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio 1212

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Radio 1212

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Frankly I don't have time to plow through the millions of guidelines needed to start discussing the deletion of a page. This article cites NO sources whatsoever, Radio 1212 seems to only exist on Wikipedia. I don't know what else to say. Hopefully this is brought to the attention to someone who knows what they're doing. Dapperedavid (talk) 22:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A large variety of sources can be found under the German language name "Nachtsender 1212". Passes WP:GNG.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Discussion was originally created without the {{afd2}} template. Discussion was never transcluded to a daily log page. Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 06:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Firstly, the article does have a source, it's just not in-line. Secondly, reliable sources very clearly exist (a book, the German broadcasting archive, a Rhineland public broadcaster, and these were found after just 5 minutes from the other language articles; a quick Google search of "radio 1212", "Nachtsender 1212", and "sender 1212" returned these sources: Time, a very in-depth article by the Tennessee Ledger, a radio interview). I'm sure other sources exist as well. The nominator blatantly disregarded a WP:BEFORE search, which is literally the only thing you need to do before an AfD nomination. Curbon7 (talk) 07:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Plenty of sourcing available as others have stated. If editors think their time is so precious that they don't need to follow guidelines then it's advisable not to bother editing. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.