Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical love (social psychology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radical love (social psychology)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of people use the term "radical" as a rhetorical device because it makes the topic of discussion sound more interesting and distinctive. In this case, it is not apparent to me that any of the cited authors are in a continuity of tradition developing "radical love" as a shared concept. The primary use discussed, by Gómez, does not appear to be notable. Daask (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 22:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is not clearly notable, when I did a scholar search I found too many articles using this in different ways.Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.