Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiation Free Lakeland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 02:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radiation Free Lakeland[edit]

Advert for a very recently formed action group. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable environmental activist group, no indication of notability, and hasn't been around long enough to establish notability. The person who created the group is herself non-notable. No reason to keep the article as it meets none of the inclusion criteria, either under WP:N or WP:GROUP. Theseeker4 (talk) 18:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Information in the tradition of Wiki on a non profit group concerned about recent decision affecting Cumbria and the North West -"no indication of notability" apart from role in informing Cumbria County Council on health effects of radiation. Group provides info from scientists in the field of radiation. Information which is not forthcoming from the nuclear industry to individuals, groups and councils "The person who created the group is herself non-notable" well don't like to blow own trumpet! -Artist and Campaigner ( Artist with Random House and Medici - successful campaigns - Rusland Beeches/Gm Free Cumbria) Marianne Birkby 22 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.105.126 (talk)

Delete. Has major notability problems, mainly (1) formed in December 2008; (2) no significant mention of the organization in a major news source. This group could end up being notable at one point or another, but not now. --Bobak (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.