Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RadASM (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RadASM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only reference is primary. Clean-up templates from 2010 haven't been addressed. No indication of meeting WP:GNG. Dgpop (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. Only ref is to a computer science department how-to manual. A search turned up incidental mentions, but no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was previously deleted at afd in 2007. Dialectric (talk) 18:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing has changed in regards to notability since the first AfD. SL93 (talk) 08:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability guideline. No reliable coverage on software. PlotHelpful (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.