Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racin and Rockin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Racin and Rockin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about an event with no strong claim of notability per WP:NEVENT, and with significant advertorial overtones to the writing ("Off the track and after the race, the Basement Dawgs took to the stage to provide the live music while track owner Paul Zimmerman manned the BBQ.") This is referenced almost entirely to primary sources, with the exception of a single piece of media coverage, and it's so poorly maintained that the 2008 edition is still described as the "upcoming" one. Simply being able to verify that a thing existed, however, is not enough to get it a Wikipedia article -- it needs to have significantly more reliable source coverage about it than this before it can be considered notable. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A quick reminder: When commenting please stick to the subject at hand. Cite policies and/or guidelines when possible. And for the love of G--, be brief!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Babymissfortune 03:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.