Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Vetter Huang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Vetter Huang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet the academic notability guidelines. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 04:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 04:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My edits) @ 04:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now at best perhaps as my searches found links at News, Books, browsers and Highbeam but none of seems to suggest outstanding better notability and improvement. Notifying DGG for academics insight. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The relevant standard here is really MUSIC not PROF. DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I'm surprised because her level of appointment and activity usually results in enough general coverage to support a keep vote but I'm unable to see it here. Each of the chamber groups is just below the notability bar that one would expect coverage of the individual members. So there's no pass on GNG or music. The articles are not of high enough number and the academic position not senior enough to consider a WP:PROF pass. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.