Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Levy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. bainer (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Levy

WP:NOT a memorial. Gets 18,000 google hits but most of those seem to be other "Rachel Levy"'s or wikipedia mirrors. Pboyd04 03:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment At the time this created quite a stir and was covered in major news outlets. N Shar 03:49, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Palestinian political violence - condense the relevant info into a paragraph and add it to the "current political violence" section. Fabricationary 04:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but maybe merge per above... this is all verifiable and attracted quite a bit of media coverage and public interest. --W.marsh 04:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain for now. I found 479 unique google hits for her, so there is a certain level of fame. Pburka 04:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - Her name pops up often on sites about the Intifada, but beyond being blown up she has no other claim to fame, and WP:NOT a memorial. If this isn't deleted, then merge and redirect per Fabricationary -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect per Fabricationary -- D a Gizza ^Chat 10:25, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though I'd support the merge suggested by Fabrictionary, too. Levy passes the bar for notability due to the news coverage. I'm pretty certain she even made the cover of a major news magazine (I want to say Time but I've been unable to find an online source to confirm). 23skidoo 15:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or possible merge. Seems a fairly well-written article about an arguably notable news story. Robin Johnson 16:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as per Robin. Themusicking 20:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep please because of the coverage Yuckfoo 22:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being in Newsweek seems notable enough. Johnleemk | Talk 00:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Victims can be notable. Story is well known and is verifiably documented. Her "American-ness" made lots of news here. MKaiserman 14:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Grue 13:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable story, widespread coverage, all verifiable. —Cleared as filed. 14:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.