Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Haywire
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Rachel Haywire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. Current article is mostly things that she wrote, or passing mentions of her. I searched my library's database (which has access to newspapers etc) and it came up empty for sources on her. just to add detail in the form of specific searches; nothing in the NYT; some weird bloggy thing here in Wired. nothing in LA Times. Google-searched out ten pages, bunch of fringe-y blogs. Just plain fails GNG. Jytdog (talk) 06:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. To establish notability, sources must be about the subject. These are not. Guy (Help!) 08:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails GNG. I just wasted ten minutes of my life trying to find something substantive. -Roxy the dog™ bark 09:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete lack of sources about the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.