Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race Owen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Race Owen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability and zero sources (other than IMDB) since 2008. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: I haven't found any reliable sources that would go towards WP:GNG. The subject has only had one significant role, in American Heiress, so he falls a little shy of WP:NACTOR. He has won three awards, according to IMDb, but I'm not sure that they would suffice to meet WP:ANYBIO. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete articles with this sub-standard of sourcing should not stand for 13 hours let alone 13 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Pack Lambert, have you any view regarding the awards the subject has won? Dflaw4 (talk) 12:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless someone adds independent 3rd party sourcing to the article supporting that he won the awards there is no reason to even consider them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But, hypothetically speaking, what are your thoughts on the awards themselves, John Pack Lambert? Dflaw4 (talk) 10:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I said we need 3rd party reliable sources supporting their relevance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, forget that I asked, John Pack Lambert. Dflaw4 (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.