Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race: The Power of an Illusion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per consensus that notability has been established. Also, as an FYI, WP:FILM is a shortcut to a Wikiproject. WP:MOVIE is the notability guideline. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Race: The Power of an Illusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lack of notability and fails WP:FILM criteria. Enigma message 15:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I find the nomination difficult to understand, as the article contains sources that demonstrate notability. Could the nominator please expand a bit on the reasoning behind the assertion that there is a "lack of notability"? Phil Bridger (talk) 23:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It was mentioned in passing by two articles. I don't feel that demonstrates notability. Also, this fails WP:FILM in my opinion. Enigma message 19:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It was not mentioned "in passing". Those articles are about this subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad. You're right. I still think it should be deleted, however. Enigma message 20:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sounds like a show i would hate and could only watch if i believed a gun were being held to my head. Nevertheless, the show is notable and the article provides the evidence. --Firefly322 (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article demonstrates notability.Wik-e-wik (talk) 01:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.