Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RELOADED (warez)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was A7 Speedy. Tawker (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RELOADED (warez)[edit]

Just a random website. No indication of why or how this is notable. The only sentence in the entire article has {{fact}} stuck on it. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 18:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7 Sceptre ^(talk) 18:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per A7. Already tagged as such. No assertion of notability. Existence isn't notability. DarkAudit (talk) 18:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just an FYI but 5 minutes before this AFD was created it had way more content and looked like this. Gary King (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. That looks worse though. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 18:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not really; it has information that could help anyone who wants to go looking for references. Gary King (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It will be difficult to find any mention of this group in traditional media. However, some pirate news sites mention it; I know Slyck does, like at "Major Piracy Bust Against Top Providers. Also, here are some more references that claim RELOADED cracked StarForce (they are in French, which I can read): La protection Starforce 3 cassée and StarForce : le casseur cassé. Gary King (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.