Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RAD Game Tools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bink Video. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RAD Game Tools[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Cloudbound (talk) 23:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bink Video, their best known work. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had few meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search, apart from press releases. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 03:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as mentioned as none of this suggests solid independent notability at all and I would've also been bold to close this as such but I'll wait for any other comments. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I really wish I could have found some sources, because I think RAD is an important part of the games industry (and history). But they're almost exclusively mentioned in relation to their products only. Even the awards are all to the product, rather than the company. Bink is probably the best target, or maybe Miles Sound System (Which despite its poor shape has won several industry awards). -- ferret (talk) 22:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.