Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R2DA - Roblox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 23:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

R2DA - Roblox[edit]

(Find video game sources: "R2DA - Roblox" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Article topic (user-created content for a video game) lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Sourced entirely to primary sources, not even worth redirecting to Roblox. czar 18:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 18:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pretty much a straight up copy of the primary source - promotional with no indication of notability.PRehse (talk) 18:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is no claim to notability. There seems to be no independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG for starters. "Reason to Die Awakening" should do just that. --Bejnar (talk) 19:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article has no third-party independent reliable sources to establish notability. TheDeviantPro (talk) 06:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems to be entirely self-promotinal and lacks reliable sources. Searingjet (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.