Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Scott Oswald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

R. Scott Oswald

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He is non-notable. His cases have received some media coverage, but he for himself hasn't received much coverage. The awards mentioned in the article are either regional or from online publications. Susana Hodge (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - moderately noted CLE lecturer, often in the media, and active in the ABA. What do you think, Newyorkbrad, or SpyLawyer? Bearian (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.