Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. J. Danvers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

R. J. Danvers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article was on AFD before, the decision to keep it was based on the fact that the subject starred in a movie that now has been deleted on wikipedia (not notable), blog sources and pornbio. Now that the movie has been recognized as not notable and porn bio has been deprecated, there is nothing in this bio to prove notability. I looked for other sources but couldn't find anything. AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 11:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominating on behalf of AlejandroLeloirRey above, who tried to nominate using Page Curation but encountered the bug therein with second (and subsequent) AfD nominations. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 20:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC) [reply]

~~Comment~~. delete. The article's current sources are junk. However, a WP:BEFORE re-check indicates some RS coverage under his newer HungerFF stage name, such as a few Vice article and an interview-like profile in Out. Not there yet on WP:BASIC, ~~but I'll hold back on a !vote for further searching~~. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the Vice article is more than a mention but it is far away from a cover of the subject. in the whole article one paragraph is about him. the Out article is a chat with him about fisting. so, neither of them have any importance in deciding if the subject is notabile. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 08:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Further searching yielded only press releases and minor porn award nominations. While the current non-zero RS coverage is an improvement over 2008, it still cannot establish notability per WP:BASIC nor prove it per WP:ENT. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.