Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Bhuvan Chandra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 15:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

R. Bhuvan Chandra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who has had one major role in a very minor film - does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Probably conflict of interest issues as well, and it looks like much of the article was copied from his own website (but it is not a straightforward copyvio speedy deletion, I think). bonadea contributions talk 06:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 06:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 06:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. @Sharkslayer87, the current article doesn't actually say why the subject is notable. Please expand with some reliable sources. Accesscrawl (talk) 07:07, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for working on the article, Sharkslayer87. One of the sources you added was the subject's own website, and that can never count towards showing notability. The other source merely confirms that he was in the movie Kidi; that information was already in the article, and again one major role in a film does not make an actor meet WP:NACTOR. (The source itself is a trivial mention in an article about another topic, namely the movie). --bonadea contributions talk 07:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Accesscrawl,@Bonadea I undestand now. As it doesn't meet the notability criteria, I vote for its deletion. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.