Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.S. Praveen Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

R.S. Praveen Kumar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The draft at Draft:Repalle Shiva Praveen Kumar has today been declined as not adequately showing the subject's notability. Without seeing the previous articles and drafts it isn't clear how much the notability has changed since WP:Articles for deletion/Dr Repally Shiva Praveen Kumar and WP:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Repalle Shiva Praveen Kumar, and since the deletion of R. S. Praveen Kumar, Dr Repalle Shiva Praveen Kumar, and Dr. R S Praveen Kumar. Continual creation with slightly different titles does give rise to suspicion of gaming the system. David Biddulph (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~. Possibly notable as an advocate of rights for the Dalit people of India. See https://www.google.com/search?q=%22R.S.+Praveen+Kumar%22&tbm=nws Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References are enough to keep the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteI had voted keep, but seems that this is promotional, with it being constantly re-created after deletion. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The coverage is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Agree with nom: this has the hallmarks of COI / UPE, with troubling creation history and language such as "...widely known as the brain behind the success story of the Everest conquerors..." (!). K.e.coffman (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--Nowhere close to garnering sustained encyclopedic coverage.Trivial name-mentions in news-pieces are not sufficient enough.~ Winged Blades^Godric 06:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & Salt Non notable individual. Constant re-creation of an article that was deleted in AfD. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr_Repally_Shiva_Praveen_Kumar)--Hagennos ❯❯❯ Talk 04:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.