Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.E.M. at Cologne Cathedral
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
R.E.M. at Cologne Cathedral[edit]
- R.E.M. at Cologne Cathedral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
One concert? Not notable. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete as indiscriminate. It's not as if the concert itself was in any way notable. I don't think it is in WP's interests to have articles of the infinite permutations of band + venue. It will be never ending. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, not notable in any way, I'm tired of having random articles created like this. Not every concert ever given is important! Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 01:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:N. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Would probably fail WP:N due to Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information. A concert review for, say, a performance at Woodstock would be notable. Concerts, however large, happen constantly, and are not inherently notable as a result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crtrue (talk • contribs) 08:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Regretful strong delete per WP:IINFO. Cosmic Latte (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.