Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Róbert Pukalovič (ice hockey b. 1984)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Róbert Pukalovič (ice hockey b. 1984)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: He played over 250 games in several European minor leagues, which would normally be a criterion #3 pass on NHOCKEY. Has a genuine check been made for sources in European papers? Ravenswing 23:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only leagues he has played in that count towards Criterion #3 are the Slovak Extraliga and the Mestis, in which he has played a total of 66 games and he has won no awards. He definitely fails NHOCKEY. Joeykai (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't have to coverage for GNG or the accomplishments for NHOCKEY.Mdtemp (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Ravenswing. --Hockeyben ^{(talk -} ^contribs) 14:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete As joey points out he only played 66 games in leagues that meet Criteria #3. So he does fail NHOCKEY. -DJSasso (talk) 12:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As previously noted above, he does fail NHOCKEY and trying to find a reliable source about him is very difficult. Deadman137 (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete instead as this consensus shows there's still not enough convincingly better to keep. SwisterTwister talk 19:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.