Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R$VP Clothing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

R$VP Clothing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Presently, this company does not appear to have attracted the notice of independent publishers. A Google search for this company with the "R$VP" orthography reveals Wikipedia hits only. Searches for "RSVP Clothing" returned web pages that could not be definitively linked to this company. (Contested PROD). NTox · talk 05:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see the Refimprove tag was removed as well as contesting the Prod. As it stands, refimprove was generous as the only ref is to the company's own site. I'm not seeing any searchable refs available either. This could go under a WP:CSD A7? or perhaps a G11? AllyD (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for chiming in. Despite everything, I don't think this article is eligible for speedy deletion under the narrow CSD criteria. NTox · talk 22:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also had a quick Google around but could't find ANYTHING. Smart business move to have a name that can't be Googled - every time I try, even with quotes, it keeps searching "R VP" rather than "R$VP"... even so, you'd think there ought to be at least something coming up... Mabalu (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.