Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qwikcilver

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 18:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qwikcilver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a corporate Spam. Press coverage combined into one wiki article. Writing is corporate brochure and reads like a work of online PR. Light2021 (talk) 06:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dreamyshade (talk) 18:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To address the new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- the above sources lack WP:CORPDEPTH and are routine and / or PR-driven coverage, as in:
  • "Qwikcilver sees spike in giftcard usage post demonetisation!" Etc.
Delete for lack of sources that discuss the subject directly and detail, beyond company funding, plans, aspirations and self-promotion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:39, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.