Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuotePort

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QuotePort[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD with no justification. Quotations website that currently contains no third-party sources, only links to its own website. The article creator, QuotePort, is likely to have a conflict of interest and I have dropped a note explaining so on their userpage. The website does not appear to meet the notability criteria for web content. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 15:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as non-notable. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I didn't find anything third-party that was notable on Google (Google News) and Yahoo! search.SwisterTwister talk 19:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found zero significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 23:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unspectacular website, no characteristics-of-note

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.