Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quickform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, because it fails WP:CORP. Ian Manka Talk to me! 20:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quickform[edit]

Prod removed. This article reads like an advert. May be notable, but no claims to meet WP:WEB or WP:CORP are presented. 0 Ghits for Quickform "Fredrik Delin" "Marcus Bergström" and 175 for Quickform Marbella. Scientizzle 21:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete per nom. Tevildo 22:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've made it read less like an advert. Wikibout-Talk to me! 22:25, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN. Fails WP:CORP spectacuarly. Viridae ^Talk 23:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepAfter the edits it does not look like an advert. This is information about a company that meet the criterion of having a page in the wiki. How do you include references to mentionings and articles without posting it on the actual page? --Widjet 23:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Can you please take a look at WP:CORP and tell me how exactly it passes those criteria? Viridae ^Talk 00:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite the deletion of the most shameless part of the advertisement, it still is an utterly un-notable company as WP:CORP easily demonstrates. Pascal.Tesson 04:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reasons as above (though fairly obvious on reading article and WP:CORP...) Inner Earth 22:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.