Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queppelin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Queppelin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undersourced company profile created by COI editor. Ref#1 is a simple listing, #2 is an interview-based advertorial, #3 is a passing mention and #4 is a promotional YouTube video. None of these sources establish notability, a Google search revealed no other promising in-depth sources (news coverage consists of press releases, interviews and other PR activities) - no evidence that this company meets our notabilty guidelines. Note: I have removed some other links that were equally unsuitable for encyclopedic usage. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Totally not notable and clearly was intended for the purpose of promotion. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources on the pager are pretty terrible, but searching more widely only shows existence, not notability. Not notable. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 11:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like more sections than available sources. Dorama285 (talk) 20:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.