Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer Wookie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der yck C. 21:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Queer Wookie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sources provided are hard to verify, google search doesn't bring up much in regards to notability. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 21:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article itself indicates the band never went anywhere. The SPIN article simply names it as one of the worst bands with very little narrative text, and what little text there is does not constitute coverage about the band, but is just the article writer being sarcastic, or thinking he is witty. There is no other coverage about this band. -- Whpq (talk) 18:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability online, except for the one Spin article. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Whpq. Not even the article naming them as the 2nd worst band cares to say anything about them - frankieMR (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks sufficient indicia of notability.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.