Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queer West News
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Queer West News[edit]
- Queer West News (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. "Online newsletter for the southwest of England". Fails WP:WEB and WP:CORP. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems I didn't finish the AfD process - now it's up. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB. Note that it was founded last year and (according to the website) is now defunct. An online newsletter running for roughly a year would have had to be pretty darn spectacular to pass our article guidelines, and I see no indication in the article or elsewhere that such was the case. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 03:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Short-lived, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 03:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with the above argued points regarding deleting this article as I too was unable to find sufficient sources on Google News or Google Books. --Elisabeth Rogan (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.