Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queensland Pacific Airways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Air Queensland. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Queensland Pacific Airways[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article that does not cite any sources. Airline only existed for one year. There appears to be no notability what so ever. Funplussmart (talk) 01:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 July 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:55, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:04, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being a stub is not a good reason for merging an article. The ariline was notable while it operated, which means that it is notable today. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - in reality it is already merged into Air Queensland. --Baerentp (talk) 09:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The information is already included into the Air Queensland article, we don't unnecessarily duplicate information. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Air Queensland - an airline is not intrinsically notable, and operating some DC-3s in Australia at a time when several dozen DC-3s were still in service in the country does not confer notability. A brief blip in history. YSSYguy (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Air Queensland. Queensland Pacific Airways is as notable as any defunct airline, and there are plenty of them on Wikipedia, but unless this stub has a realistic chance of being substantially expanded, then it's better to consolidate the information on the subject by merging. Air Queensland itself is a stub; merging could help it getting higher on the quality scale. --Deeday-UK (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:21, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Air Queensland. It deserves at least a mention but not its own article. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Air Queensland, which presently only has a passing mention; WP:ATD-M. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:44, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 18:31, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Several sources date back to 1970s - 1990s in Google Books. I support merge into Air Queensland. Rzvas (talk) 04:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.