Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queens International Film Festival
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Queens International Film Festival[edit]
- Queens International Film Festival (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete, spamlike advertisment Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 20:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 20:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A quick Google new search shows the subject passes notability, and this AfD qualifies for WP:WTF???. And this began within one minute of the editors first contribution? Contributions from a new editor need to be helped and encouraged, not squashed like a bug. Dekkappai (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Just about enough coverage to pass. I agree Dekkappai, nominating an article seconds after nomination is bad practice. Note the guidelines "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." --neon white talk 23:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wow this is a bit of a rediculous nomination. Clearly notable. -Djsasso (talk) 20:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep as even mimimal WP:BEFORE show numerous sources toward notability and any concerns of the stub's 3 sentences are best addressed through WP:CLEANUP, not deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.