Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any third-party, in-depth coverage of this organization. Plenty of mentions but nothing to pass WP:CORP. Failed CSD A7 in 2020. Toddst1 (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WITHDRAWN: With the hidden info presented by Brigade Piron. Toddst1 (talk) 15:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is not kept as a separate article then sourced content should be merged elewhere - maybe to Elisabeth of Bavaria, Queen of Belgium. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Quick keep. I suspect the nom conducted a search with the non-notable English term rather than "Fondation médicale Reine Élisabeth" or its Dutch equivalent. Especially in the pre-war period, the FMRE was an research institute with a genuinely international reputation and it is still a major funder of medical research in Belgium. It is discussed in academic sources, eg 1. Its original Art Deco building might well be notable in its own right and is discussed at length, eg. Tourist Website and Brussels Region Heritage Listing. —Brigade Piron (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the evidence provided by Brigade Piron. Another example of the importance of searching in the subject's own language when conducting WP:BEFORE.Oakshade (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is an old foundation and there is a likely to be tons of coverage waiting to be discovered. scope_creep^Talk 16:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Brigade Piron.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone who knows how to close Afds please close this one? There's no need to pile on more opinions when the original poster has withdrawn. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.