Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quartz Hill High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep per general consensus that high school articles are to be kept. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 17:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing this entire page thats makes this worthy of an encyclopedic entry. The fact that the school exists is not enough for a wiki entry. Jporcaro 21:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per precedent that all high schools have been kept, and that this one meets the WP:SCH proposal.Gateman1997 21:47, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, good article, valuable to the citizens of Quartz Hill. Kappa 21:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Like every day, I support all high schools. -- JJay 22:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is not a stub, has verifiable info, and is notable in the area. -Willmcw 22:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per my usual reasons and per Gateman Jcuk 22:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:SCH. Even after some fluff removal, this meets required content requirements. Also, I've added a notable alumni. --Rob 23:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above. Calsicol 01:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge into school district or town if article is both below three sentances and lacks any sort of illustration, boxed info-template or picture when AFD is closed. This school, like all others, is an important public institution and should be written about somewhere, even if it cannot sustain an article on it's own. Presently people do create school articles containing neutral, verifiable information and it is impossible to delete them, even though many have a desire to do so. Rather than striving for an impossible consensus to delete any given school article, I feel it is always preferable and takes much less energy to merge the text of the article into an article about a suitable habitation or administrative unit: a city, county or state, or a school district of local education authority of other school system, while taking care not to delete the information contained in the article. If the article is merged, the current location should be replaced by a redirect, and the edit history maintained for future use. This is the baseline consensus that I feel was reached at WP:SCH. Hipocrite - «Talk» 03:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain While this is a particularly well-written school articles, it is nonetheless an article about a school for which nothing spaecial can be said. I see nothing in this article which raises this school above anything ordinary. Howevere, I am abstaining from voting to delete school articles as long as discussion at WP:SCH is ongoing. Denni ☯ 04:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Quartz Hill just became a lot more notable. It shows why we need more school articles. -I added some info about the arrests. - JJay 09:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep clear past precedent to keep high schools. This one is among the better and more informative of the high school articles as well and it is too big to merge. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — can AfD focus more on articles that are likely to get deleted? This is getting silly. High school articles are approaching a bad-faith nomination IMO. — RJH 16:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.