Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quark@BITS, Goa
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Quark@BITS, Goa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
University technology festival. Is it notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- Its a national level tech-fest at one of the best engineering colleges in India. We also have Stanford Jazz Workshop, Techfest, Daksh (Technical Festival) articles. If Quark@BITS, Goa lacks notability due to less media coverage, then I have nothing to say against its deletion. Its upto the article originator to add more reliable sources to prove notability.Abhishek Talk 04:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While university festival can be notable, without sources this one does not seem to be. If it is an important fest, then newspapers or science magazines would certainly mention it.Yobmod (talk) 09:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Yobmod; if it was notable, there'd be sources. Stifle (talk) 08:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yobmad and Stifle are right about the lack of sources. A brief hunt on Google only produces two hits; one was this wiki article, the other was a blog. Whilst gHits aren't the only source of notability, I think it says a lot here. Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 10:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.