Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantros (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quantros

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actually kept in 2011 because of the sheer unbelievable acceptance of local PR and republishing of it; my own searches are noticeably finding nothing at all than mentions, everything listed here is then also only PR and trivial coverage, none of it is actual significant and substantial news, and I imagine it would not either, since it was apparently started by someone connected to the company (either an employee or PR agent, SPA of course). None of this suggests anything of actual improvements, and because Wikipedia has substantially changed about PR since 2011, we have better choices now to say no to such advertisements. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete blatant ad, blatantly promotional "references" - David Gerard (talk) 22:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- strictly "corporate blurb" & WP:NOT applies, as this page exists to promote the company. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.