Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantic Dream
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP as expanded by User:SG. — JIP | Talk 09:00, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No content but an infobox. Thryduulf 21:08, 16 September 2005 (UTC).[reply]
- Content added, vote changed to keep. Thryduulf 12:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there no speedy delete category for that? Jkelly 22:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless expanded. — Phil Welch 00:05, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - Check out the games mentioned in the infobox. Google them up, especially Fahrenheit, the new one, this isn't Space Station 13, people. I know Fahrenheit has been covered in pretty much every UK games publication, and critically acclaimed. I actually saw this article about a week ago, when I noted down Omikron for merging, but I don't know enough about them to expand past the infobox, and do not have time to research it. - Hahnchen 00:31, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I said I couldn't expand beyond the infobox. But what if there was no infobox and it was all the information there is written in prose. It would contain more information than many stubs. - Hahnchen 00:35, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - I agree with Hahnchen. There are many stubs with little or no content. That's no reason to pick on this, that's actually the point of the collaboration of the week. This studio deserves it's own article as much as Atari. — SG 00:57, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I just added content to the page; still a stub, but now that it has content, there's no grounds for deletion. I believe the notice can be removed now. — SG 01:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Well done on the expansion. It is typical to let the debate run its course however. Thryduulf 12:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I just added content to the page; still a stub, but now that it has content, there's no grounds for deletion. I believe the notice can be removed now. — SG 01:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.