Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuantInsti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QuantInsti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate significant coverage in independent, reliable and secondary sources. The article is written like a marketing brochure. M4DU7 (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article sourced to a press release, a brief quotation by someone associated with the company, a routine announcement, and user reviews, none of which meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches find more press release coverage and this interview but not the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.