Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qualia (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Qualia (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Almost all the referencces are routine notices about funding and the like, DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oppose/keep I've noticed that this company is either not tagged or tagged incorrectly as qualia on existing pages. I can look to add addtional information if that would help notability, thanks. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions, thanks! — Preceding undated comment added 14:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - present references are all fundraising, and a quick WP:BEFORE shows a sea of press releases and press release churnalism. This just doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Best I can say is WP:TOOSOON - David Gerard (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails SIGCOV. Sources are not independent but paid PR campaigns. ^Ramaswar _(discuss) 16:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The problem is many of the sources are press releases or they are just routine mentions. It also doesn't help the article is heavily promotional. Imcdc (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.