Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qu Lan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Qu Lan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just does not feel like this person is notable enough. (I can be wrong, of course, as I am not much involved in the art field.) Delete. --Nlu (talk) 04:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:27, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A google search fails to yield anything.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 10:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 15:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment zh:瞿瀾 is also flagged for notability and primary source problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hisashiyarouin (talk • contribs) 05:40, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.