Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qnet
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep. No proper deletion rationale. Nominator is also now blocked, which doesn't help the case. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Qnet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Over 150+ dead links, 90% article is almost cited with dead links, either needs to be restructured entirely or deleted until. Systumm (talk) 02:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Hong Kong, and India. Systumm (talk) 02:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dead links are not a deletion rationale; have you tried running IAbot to fix them? jp×g🗯️ 03:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, as said above, that's not a deletion rationale, and 90% of dead links are fixable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.