Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qianpu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qianpu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sourcing to indicate notability. It (前埔) is an area of Siming District, not a place, and most likely consists of several communities (社区); if you question this assertion, see this link. For articles covered under WP:NC-ZH, we almost never write articles on non-official districts/areas of specific cities. The only exception I can think of is Beijing, but that is perhaps because sourcing is better –HXL's Roundtable and Record 07:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Keb25 (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.