Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qamar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Al-Qamar. MBisanz talk 02:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Qamar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:NOT. This was in Wikipedia as a word or common name, with no real-world referent. Now it's a redirect to Name, which is somewhat silly. "prod" was deleted, so we have to do this the hard way. John Nagle (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- this belongs at Redirects for deletion, not here. Other than that, I agree with you. Reyk YO! 02:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It was changed to a redirect only after a "prod" was placed on the article. There might be a justification for keeping the old form of the article.[1] There's not much of a case for it being a redirect to Name. So it probably should be dealt with as an AfD. --John Nagle (talk) 02:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. I restored the content (such as it is) so that we can have a proper deletion discussion. My suggestion is to merge with Al-Qamar, much less pointless than redirecting to name. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect to Al-Qamar per above. That makes sense. I didn't know that article existed. --John Nagle (talk) 04:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as per David's suggestion. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 09:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect to Al-Qamar. This looks more like a Wiktionary entry by itself. NoVomit (talk) 12:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.