Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q Squared Joe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as non-notable. —Sean Whitton / 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Q Squared Joe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence of notability for this card game. Online searches (which, of course, need not cover all possible sources) fail to produce anything relevant that is not a mirror of Wikipedia in some form or another. This article lacks third party sources of any kind and seems to violate WP:NFT as I can't locate anything to suggest otherwise. (Attention to other editors: Please note the link at the bottom of the article to a facebook list of "People against taking this page down".) --Craw-daddy | T | 09:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —--Craw-daddy | T | 09:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are plenty of sources for Q Squared Joe or Q2J. If you search Q2J rather than Q Squared Joe, you get much more results (A few of dozen) from a variety of sites. - TriHeadedQQQ —Preceding unsigned comment added by TriHeadedQQQ (talk • contribs) 21:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC) — TriHeadedQQQ (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Then please add some of these sources, and if they are reliable I will withdraw my nomination. As is, there is nothing to demonstrate notability in the article. --Craw-daddy | T | 22:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable card game. Edward321 (talk) 00:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable game that seems to be a classic 'made up one day at school' candidate. Nuttah (talk) 08:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.