Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QTrace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence provided or argument made that the subject meets WP:GNG j⚛e decker ^talk 04:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

QTrace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Only the TechRepublic article is from a Reliable Source. I can't find anything else that marks this as notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability. Current refs do not constitute significant coverage in reliable sources - As above, TechRepublic is RS coverage, but is a how-to article, and on its own not sufficient to establish notability. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 13:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.