Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Python Software Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I can't find a keep consensus on the basis of often poor arguments, but there's clearly no consensus to delete or merge. Merger discussion can continue on the talk page. Sandstein 18:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Python Software Foundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

almost no independent references DGG ( talk ) 09:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as I am quite sure the foundation responsible for one of the most popular programming languages[1][2][3] is sufficiently notable. It isn't unusual for a software platform to have a foundation article, such as Apache, .NET and F# to name a few. The fact the article needs development and additional referencing isn't a suitable rationale for removal. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thereferences you cite are about the language, notthe foundation. Nobody is challenging that Python is notable . DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware the cites are for the language, which is why I say immediately beforehand "one of the most popular programming languages". I do feel this is a fairly important consideration. The foundation is responsible for it. If the AfD sways towards deletion, which I hope it doesn't, it could well question the integrity of the other "foundation" articles aforementioned. This article, like so many others, would indeed benefit from additional 3rd party referencing, but I don't accept the fairly vague rationale offered. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect into Python (programming language). Based off of my reading of the sources, I can't say that the two would be independently notable. I also don't think that the Python language article is so long that length would become a problem. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep certainly shouldn't be deleted outright; I don't think a merge to Python (programming language) would be an editorial improvement. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep without merging. The computing world does not document iteself well outside of academia. However the Python Software Foundation is one of the computing nonprofits analyzed in
- Jyh-An Lee (1 January 2012). Nonprofit Organizations and the Intellectual Commons. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78100-158-5. OCLC 1027550705..

StarryGrandma (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Python programming language article is already lengthy, I don't think it needs more content merged into it. NemesisAT (talk) 11:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.