Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyrotechnical mine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete --Tone 22:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pyrotechnical mine

Not an exact repost, but the article has been created by the same user and deleted in the past. Gray Porpoise_{Your wish is my command!} 00:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, lack of notability or verifiable sources. hateless 00:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — lack of notability. Dionyseus 01:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per CSD G1 and G4. The page is clearly a joke. --Sable232 02:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - lack of context. So tagged. MER-C 02:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per Sable232. Hagerman^(talk) 02:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect To Pyrotechnics, google shows that they seem to exist, but I can't track down much to make it verifiable, so a redirect would make sense here. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 03:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. P.B. Pilh e t / Talk 03:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, little context, no assertion of notability. A redirect to pyrotechnics may make sense. Seraphimblade 03:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-encyclopedic, no sources cited and little in content.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 05:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom et al - don't think the redirect would be useful. SkierRMH,08:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep, has potential to be a decent article, has a couple of hundred plus hits. At worst make it a redirect to Pyrotechnics instead. Mathmo ^Talk 08:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sable232, not a joke, 222 hits on Google. But it is unsourced, unverifiable and there is no assertion of notability. --Majorly 11:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't saying the subject is a joke, but the previous version of the article was. --Sable232 17:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. ← ANAS ^Talk? 12:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TSO1D 15:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Firework or Pyrotechnics. --- RockMFR 17:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G5. Author Jsgray1993 (talk · contribs) is clearly sock of previous creator, banned Jsg1993 (talk · contribs). - Fan-1967 21:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.