Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pydio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. consensus DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pydio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a software product directory. ubiquity (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn proposal to include other articles in this AfD

In response to a PROD, the article creator asserted that Pydio deserves an article just as much as OwnCloud and Seafile do. I took at look at these articles and found them even worse than the Pydio article in terms of sourcing and notability, so I am also proposing them for deletion:

At the request of Sbmeirow (talk · contribs), I am opening separate discussions on them. ubiquity (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 18:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - For the same reasons I PROD'd the page originally. Meatsgains (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about including other articles in this AfD, settled as noted above. ubiquity (talk) 13:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Seafile and OwnCloud should be removed from this nomination and nominated separately if desired. They are completely different subjects, with differing notability. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I removed the noticed from the Seafile and OwnCloud articles, because there isn't a dedicated discussion section for each one. These are 3 different products from 3 different sources, so they shouldn't be grouped into the same discussion section. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- They are similar products, and the articles have similar problems. ubiquity (talk) 20:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - But honestly, if you feel strongly about it, I will open a separate AfD for each one, and cross-reference them. It seemed to me that this would save time, per WP:MULTIAFD. ubiquity (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - until these are split into 3 different discussions. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. ubiquity (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT - Thanks for the split. if you want to cleanup this section, you are welcome to delete all of my text and vote from "Pydio" discussion. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 21:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Several references to extensive coverage in independent reliable sources have now been added. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A quick google news search indicates coverage in reliable sources.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Software possesses relevance. Can also be found in German and French Wikipedia. --Minihaa (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.