Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PyLucid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PyLucid[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 00:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yet another content management system that offers some interesting features. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A search for PyLucid and Django found nothing resembling a WP:RS. So, it's not even worth merging to Django. Pcap ping 17:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.