Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pxixtreme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CopyVio http://www.myspace.com/pxixtreme Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pxixtreme[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BAND Closeapple (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Closeapple (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the lists of Caribbean-related deletions and Illinois-related deletions.

—Closeapple (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or speedy per my own nomination. Possibly WP:CSD#A7 — I only used AfD instead of speedy because the article claims "The Queen is known all over the world from her writing and performance of “Spend the Night” on the Scarface album MY BALLS, MY WORD." Only alleged "release" was Unexpected, allegedly on Divercity Records, but the record company itself claims it hasn't launched yet: "brand new dance music label that will be featuring amazing tunes and very talented artists" according to its own website. In any case, no release on any major label, and no other concrete claim of notability. --Closeapple (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Should have had the db-band tag added. Woogee (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sppedy delete, it's been around for too long now, as I was about to propose a deletion of it because it could be a hoax. But the copyright infringements discovered from a spammy source leaves me no choice but to go for the speedy deletion. It doesn't even have any references, which fails the notability guideline for bands. Apart from the style of editing, it contains nearly all issues that compromise the integrity. Minima c (talk) 06:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.