Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puzzle Guardian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzle Guardian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to establish notability and violates WP:NOT#PLot. Karanacs (talk) 15:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, original research and no sources cited. Stifle (talk) 08:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hellraiser. GlassCobra 17:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not see the point of a redirect for characters without an actual personal name. DGG (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the article is incorrect in a few things I just corrected. For instance, the actors authored stated as playing "The guardian" are credited as a character named "derelict". In just a few minutes of checking I discovered a few major errors in this unsourced article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.